FECRIS violates people's rights and freedoms. Cults

 The activities of anti-cult organizations violate universally recognized human rights and freedoms, which are protected by the norms of international law, as well as the Constitutions and national laws of countries, in particular: 

- The right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion;

- the right to freedom of opinion and expression;

- the right to freedom of speech;

- the right to freedom of association (association) with others;

- the right to freedom of peaceful assembly;

- the right to equal protection of the law;

- the right to equal protection against discrimination of any kind;

- the right to life, liberty and security of person;

- the right to freedom of participation in the cultural life of the community;

- the right to development;

- the right to a social and international order in which rights and freedoms can be fully realized;

- the right to recognition as a person before the law;

- the right to a fair trial;

- the right to the presumption of innocence (to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law);

- the right to respect for honor and dignity

Here is a specific example of a violation of the laws of democracy:

AIS Pro Juventu (FECRIS member in Spain): In 1999, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in the case Riera Blume and Others v. Spain (Case No. 3768097) that the Spanish authorities violated Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (guaranteeing the right to liberty) by allowing the illegal detention by the Spanish member of FECRIS for ten days, in private premises, of six adults who had joined the Centro Esotérico de investigaciones, a minority belief movement, and their attempted deprogramming. 

Let me remind you that deprogramming is the use of methods of mental or physical coercion to change a person's attitude to something, the abandonment of their beliefs, beliefs. That is, anti-cultists and those behind them (the third force) restrict freedom of thought, conscience and religion, preventing people from adhering to their beliefs and expressing them freely. 

In my research on the anti-cultists, I have seen that the accusations made by the anti-cultists against individuals and organizations turned out to be unfounded and were not confirmed during administrative investigations.  BUT! Despite the numerous courts they lost and criminal cases against them, the anti-cultists still not only exist in our society, but are actively leading us all to totalitarianism.

Here as a prime example is just a portion of the list of court cases against anti-cultists (FECRIS member organizations) for hostile speech, kidnapping and deprogramming.  

                                                                 AUSTRIA: 

Friedrich Griess: has repeatedly disseminated defamatory information against religious minorities. Many of the related lawsuits against him have ended in settlements in which he pledged not to repeat the false claims; however, he has not ceased his activities, and continues to launch attacks.

                                                                   GERMANY:  

A Munich court, on December 19, 2001, found Heide-Marie Cammans, founder of Secten-info Essen, guilty. Among other things, she was charged with stopping repeating or spreading false statements about the Takar Singh group (an Eastern religious group). She illegally accused people of rape and labeled them as: criminals and torturers.

On March 27, 1992, the German Supreme Court ruled that state funding of organizations such as AGPF and Sect-Info Essen-which are members of FECRIS-was illegal. This case was brought by the new Osho religious movement. 

                                                                        FRANCE:

UNADFI, the French branch of FECRIS, has been found guilty by a court of libel against religious minorities. 

And the list goes on...

Whoever wants to read for himself and find many more evidences on this issue.  

It is important to know that FECRIS uses two techniques: they make representatives of religious minorities, organizations either sick or criminals. Members of so-called sects, according to FECRIS, are victims and their leaders are criminals.

But as I have mentioned in my articles real evidence that the anti-cultists themselves are really mentally ill people with obvious diagnoses (you can read more carefully about Alexander Dvorkin's diagnoses in my articles as well).

The deeper I study the topic of anti-cultists, the more I see the global picture: a single infringement of rights and freedoms or persecution in the media affects the world situation as a whole. It affects the masses, the mental health of people, up to the point of hopelessness and suicidal behavior. We can confidently say that the activities of anti-cultists violate fundamental human rights and freedoms protected by international law and national laws. 

To be continued ...

Support the article by applauding, liking, reposting and commenting

#FECRIS #disinformation #cybersecurity #anti-cultists #StandUpForFreedom #StopPersecution #democracy